Letters

Neurosurgery Sends Letter to Ways and Means Committee on Surprise Medical Bills

  • Medical Liability Reform

Dear Chairman Neal and Ranking Member Brady,

On behalf of the undersigned medical organizations, we want to thank you for your efforts to
craft a balanced, bipartisan solution to end unanticipated medical bills. The framework you
released in December was promising, and we look forward to working with the Ways and Means
Committee to develop a more detailed proposal. The medical community remains committed to
working with Congress to seek an evenhanded legislative solution to protect patients from
unanticipated (“surprise”) medical bills that can occur with narrow health insurance networks
and when gaps in health insurance coverage lead them to receive care from out-of-network
physicians or other providers, while at the same time facilitating a process to quickly, efficiently
and fairly resolve physician and health plan billing disputes.

As conversations regarding a final compromise solution continue, physicians strongly believe
that the following provisions are essential to any surprise medical billing legislative solution to
ensure patients’ continued access to quality care:

  • Protecting Patients. Patients must be protected and should only be responsible for their in-network cost-sharing amounts, including deductibles, when receiving unanticipated medical care.

  • Truly Keeping Patients Out-of-the-Middle. To keep patients out-of-the-middle of any payment disputes between health plans and providers, provide physicians with direct payment/assignment of benefits from the insurer. Under proposals currently being considered in Congress, patients will continue to receive confusing bills from multiple providers following a hospitalization.

  • Ensuring Reasonable Provider Payment Rates. Following the delivery of out-of-network medical care, a reasonable payment should be paid directly to providers. A benchmark payment rate set at median or mean in-network contract rates or some percentage of Medicare is insufficient because this could increase health care costs by accelerating consolidation in the health care market, jeopardize the emergency care safety net and restrict patient access to in-network physicians.

  • Establishing a Fair, Accessible and Equitable IDR Process. If the provider determines that the insurer’s payment is not reasonable, there must be a fair, accessible and equitable IDR process to resolve payment disputes.

Read full letter here